In the previous published article,1 there were three errors.
The first error was published on page 201, in the results section of the abstract. the result section from the abstract, the following text appears: "The findings indicated that 5 of 12 factors could significantly predict Zika prevention practices of pregnant women at the Health Promotion Center Region 5 in Thailand: education, smoking behavior, check-up status during pregnancy, perception of susceptibility, and perception of benefit." The text was incorrect and should have read: "The findings indicated that 4 of 11 factors could significantly predict Zika prevention practices of pregnant women at the Health Promotion Center Region 5 in Thailand: education, check-up status during pregnancy, perception of susceptibility, and perception of benefit."
The second error was published on page 204, left column, first paragraph. In the first paragraph, the following text appears: "The respondents were classified into six age categories: 18–20 years, 21– 25 years, 26–30 years, 31–35 years, 36–40 years, and >40 years old." The text was incorrect and should have read: "The respondents were classified into five age categories: 18–20 years, 21–25 years, 26–30 years, 31–35 years and ≥36 years old."
The third error was published on page 205, in table 1, subheading age. It should have read as presented below (Table 1).
Table 1. Social determinant, perception, knowledge and preventive practice of Zika
REFERENCES
- Siramaneerat I. Perception of the Zika virus infection and its influence on Zika prevention practices by pregnant women at the Region 5 Health Promotion Center in Thailand. Med J Indones. 2018;27(3):201–8.