The burden of ocular diseases in an underdeveloped village in Southwest Sumba, Eastern Indonesia, 2016

  • Ratna Sitompul Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta
  • Yeni D. Lestari Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta
  • Simon Siregar Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta
  • Asti Ayudianingrum Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta
  • Isfiyanto Isfiyanto Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta
  • Gladys Kusumowidagdo Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta
  • Della P. Sari Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta
  • Eiko B. Matiur Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta
  • Saleha Sungkar Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta
Keywords: blindness, Indonesia, Southwest Sumba, underdeveloped district, visual impairment
Abstract viewed: 1817 times
PDF downloaded: 973 times
HTML downloaded: 146 times
EPUB downloaded: 183 times

Abstract

Background: Prevalence estimates of ocular diseases in a given district are important to plan the programs of eye care services. This study aimed to describe the burden of ocular diseases as an initial step in improving eye care services in underdeveloped areas in Indonesia.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed among residents of Perobatang Village in Southwest Sumba district in July 2016. Eye examinations were conducted by ophthalmologists, and visual acuity was measured by optometrists. Participants were provided with appropriate treatment according to diagnosis. Surgical services were offered two months after the examination.

Results: After eximining a total of 667 of 1,459 (46%) residents, the result showed that the most frequent ocular problems were presbyopia (30.8%), cataract (12.8%), refractive error (11.3%), and pterygium (10.7%). The proportion of myopia was 5.9%, hyperopia was 5.0%, and astigmatism was 2.2%. Moreover, the proportion of blindness was 10%. Cataract caused blindness in 44 participants. Other causes of blindness included age-related macular degeneration, retinopathy, optic atrophy, glaucoma, retinal detachment and trauma.

Conclusion: The burden of ocular problems in Perobatang Village, Southwest Sumba, Eastern Indonesia was high. These findings showed the importance of public health action from local government and non-governmental organizations to improve eye care services in Southwest Sumba district.

References

  1. Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya'ale D, Kocur I, Pararajasegaram R, Pokharel GP, et al. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(11):844–51.

  2. Jaggernath J, Overland L, Ramson P, Kovai V, Chan VF, Naidoo KS. Poverty and eye health. Health. 2014;6:1849–69. https://doi.org/10.4236/health.2014.614217

  3. WHO. Universal eye health: a global action plan 2014–2019. Spain: WHO; 2013.

  4. Indonesian Ministry of Health. Indonesian health profile 2013. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2013. Indonesian.

  5. Sitompul S. Retrospective hospital-based analysis of disease of the eye at a rural and impoverished district in Eastern Indonesia in 2015. Forthcoming.

  6. Taufik MIS. Evaluation of Soil Transmitted Helminths Eradication Using Triple Dose Albendazole in Perobatang Village, Southwest Sumba, Indonesia [thesis]. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia; 2017. Indonesian.

  7. Kidd Man RE, Fenwick EK, Sabanayagam C, Li LJ, Gupta P, Tham YC, et al. Prevalence, correlated, and impacts of uncorrected presbyopia in a multiethnic asian population. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;168:191–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.05.019

  8. Patel I, Munoz B, Burke AG, Kayongoya A, McHiwa W, Schwarzwalder AW, West SK. Impact of presbyopia on quality of life in a rural African setting. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:728–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.01.028

  9. Laviers HR, Omar F, Jecha H, Kassim G, Gilbert C. Presbyopic spectacle coverage, willingness to pay for near correction and the impact of correcting uncorrected presbyopia in adults in Zanzibar, East Africa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Asci. 2010;51:1234–41. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.08-3154

  10. Marmamula S, Keefe JE, Rao GN. Population-based cross-sectional study of barriers to utilization of refraction services in South India. BMJ Open. 2011;1(1):e000172. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000172

  11. Nirmalan PK, Krishnaiah S, Shamanna BR, Rao GN, Thomas R. A population based assessment of presbyopia in the state of Andhra Pradesh, South India: the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:2324–8. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-1192

  12. Williams KM, Verhoeven VJM, Cumberland P, Bertelsen G, Wolfram C, Buitendijk GH, et al. Prevalence of refractive error in Europe: the Euro Epidemiology Consortium. Eur J Epidemiol. 2015;30:305–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-015-0010-0

  13. Wong TY, Zheng Y, Jonas JB, Flaxman SR, Keeffe, Leasher J, et al. Prevalence and causes of vision loss in East Asia: 1990–2010. Br J Ophtalmol. 2014;98:599–604. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304047

  14. Pan SW, Zheng YF, Anuar AR, Chew M, Gazzard G, Aung T, et al. Prevalence of refractive errors in a multiethnic asian population: the Singaporean epidemiology of eye disease study. Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:2590–8. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.13-11725

  15. Pan CW, Ramamurthy D, Saw SM. Worldwide prevalence and risk factors for myopia. Opthalmic Physiol Opt. 2012;32:3–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00884.x

  16. Liu YC, Wilkins M, Kim T, Malyugin B, Mehta JS. Cataract. Lancet. 2017;390:600–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30544-5

  17. World Health Organization. Global data on visual impairments 2010. Sweden:WHO;2012.

  18. Liu L, Wu J, Geng J, Yan Z, Huang D. Geograhical prevalence and risk factor for pterygium: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e003787. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003787

  19. Zoroquiain P, Jabbour S, Aldrees S, Villa N, Bravo-Filho V, Dietrich H, et al. High frequency of squamous intraepithelial neoplasia in pterygium related to low ultraviolet light exposure. Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology. 2016;30:113–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2016.02.007

  20. Cao XG, Li XX, Bao YZ. Relationship between pterygium and age-related cataract among rural populations living in two different latitude areas in China. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2017;10(2):3494–501.

  21. Strausser R. Rural health around the world: challenges and soutions. Family Practice. 2003;20:457–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmg422

Published
2018-02-14
How to Cite
1.
Sitompul R, Lestari YD, Siregar S, Ayudianingrum A, Isfiyanto I, Kusumowidagdo G, Sari DP, Matiur EB, Sungkar S. The burden of ocular diseases in an underdeveloped village in Southwest Sumba, Eastern Indonesia, 2016. Med J Indones [Internet]. 2018Feb.14 [cited 2024Apr.20];26(4):277-85. Available from: http://mji.ui.ac.id/journal/index.php/mji/article/view/1808
Section
Community Research

Most read articles by the same author(s)