Section Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conflict of Interest Acknowledgment References
Basic Medical R esearch
Detection and identification of azithromycin resistance mutations on Treponema pallidum 23S rRNA gene by nested multiplex polymerase chain reaction
pISSN: 0853-1773 • eISSN: 2252-8083
https://doi.org/10.13181/mji.v26i2.1543 Med J Indones. 2017;26:90–6
Received: August 26, 2016
Accepted: May 23, 2017
Author affiliation:
1 Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
2 Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
Corresponding author:
Yeva Rosana
E-mail: yeva.rosana@ui.ac.id
Background
Azithromycin-resistant strains of Treponema pallidum is associated with the mutation of 23S rRNA gene of T. pallidum. Although these strains are now prevalent in many countries, there is no laboratory test kit to detect and identify these mutations. Thus, in this study we developed a nested multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect and identify A2058G and A2059G mutations in 23S rRNA gene.
Methods
Three primer sets were designed for nested PCR reactions. To obtain maximum PCR reaction, all parameters were optimized. The specificity of the primer sets was evaluated towards some microorganisms. A sensitivity test was conducted to get detection limit of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). Forty-five whole blood specimens were tested by PCR, and positive results were confirmed by the DNA sequencing.
Results
The assay could detect at least 4,400 DNA copy number and showed no cross reaction with other microorganisms used in the specificity test. A total 13 of 45 whole blood specimens were PCR positive for T. pallidum, and no single mutations (either A2058G or A2059G) were detected. Two positive specimens were confirmed by the DNA sequencing and showed no mutation.
Conclusion
Nested multiplex PCR developed in this study showed a specific and sensitive test for the detection and identification of A2058G and/or A2059G mutations of 23S rRNA T. pallidum gene.
Keywords
PCR, syphilis, Treponema pallidum resistance
Following decades of low prevalence, syphilis is now resurgent in many developed countries.1 Although penicillin remains the preferred treatment for syphilis, the convenience of singledose oral administration of azithromycin, its long half-life in tissue, and its efficacy, which is equivalent to penicillin, have led to the frequent use of this antibiotic for the treatment of syphilis.1–4 Widespread use of azithromycin for the treatment of syphilis has resulted in the emergence of resistant strains to the antibiotic. Some research also showed that recent macrolide used for unrelated infections (e.g., oral, skin, respiratory, and genital infections) contributed to the increased prevalence of macrolide-resistant Treponema pallidum by providing a selective pressure.1,5,6
Azithromycin resistance is often associated with alteration of the target site (i.e., the peptidyl transferase region in domain V of 23S ribosomeribonucleic acid (rRNA)) via mutation an adenine (A)-to-guanine (G) transition at position A2058G or A2059G in the 23S rRNA gene, that alters the active site of antibiotic on ribosomes.1–3,6–8 Studies have shown the increased prevalence of azithromycinresistant T. pallidum in many developed countries over the years.9 The use of macrolide especially azithromycin is increasing in developing countries, and therefore it is likely that azithromycin-resistant T. pallidum will eventually emerge or will be introduced via travel and/or tourism.1
Antibiotic resistance indicates the need to determine the sensitivity of T. pallidum using molecular method because this bacterium cannot be cultured on artificial medium.10,11 Although resistant strains are now prevalent in many countries, no laboratory test kit is available to detect and identify these mutations. Thus, in this study we developed a nested multiplex PCR to detect and identify A2058G and A2059G mutations of T. pallidum 23S rRNA gene. Several methods could be used to detect mutation such as the polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR RFLP), real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequencing.12–14 However, real time PCR and DNA sequencing are highly expensive (reagents and instruments) and time consuming, as well as needs special skills especially for the DNA sequencing.15,16 PCR-RLFP and nested PCR are not expensive methods, in which PCR-RFLP is less sensitive than nested PCR.17 Therefore, nested multiplex PCR was developed as an alternative assay for the detection of A2058G and A2059G mutations of T. pallidum.
METHODS
Clinical specimen
Forty-five whole blood specimens were obtained from patients with secondary syphilis from the sexually transmitted diseases (STD) clinic of Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, the STD clinic of Puskesmas Pasar Rebo, the STD clinic of Tambora, and Perkumpulan Keluarga Berencana Indonesia (PKBI) Jatinegara. All patients agreed to enroll in this study by signing informed consent forms. This study was approved by Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia (FKUI) research ethical committee no. 158/UN2.F1/ETIK/2015.
Primer design
Three sets of primers were designed using primer designer (please kindly contact corresponding author to get the primer sequences). One set of the primer was used to detect T. pallidum 23S rRNA gene while the other two primer sets were used to detect the mutations (A2058G and A2059G) of T. pallidum 23S rRNA gene; thus, the nested multiplex PCR produced three DNA segments (187 bp, 130 bp and 100 bp).
Positive control
A synthetic positive control was purchased from gBlocks® gene fragments (194 bp length) having the sequences of T. pallidum 23S rRNA gene with mutations A2058G and A2059G.
DNA extraction
The DNA of T. pallidum from 200 μl whole blood specimens were extracted using high pure PCR template preparation kit (Roche) according to the manufacturer’s instructions with final elution of 70 μL.
Nested multiplex PCR
The reaction mixture of PCR 1 (20 μL): 1x PCR buffer, 1.75 mM MgCl2, 0.2 μM dNTP mix, 1x Q-solution, 0.2 μM of each primer (PCR1-F and PCR1-R), 0.5 U enzyme Taq DNA polymerase (HotStarTaq® Qiagen), and 5 μl of DNA template. The thermal cycles of PCR I: 95°C for 15 min (initial activation); 25 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec 58°C for 30 sec, and 72°C for 30 sec; and 72°C for 10 min (final extension). The reaction mixture of PCR 2 (20 μL): 1x PCR buffer, 1.13 mM MgCl2, 0.35 μM dNTPmix, 1x Q-solution, 0.45, 0.25, 0.15, 0.4 μM of 2058F, 2058R, 2059F, and 2059R primers, respectively; 1.5 U enzyme Taq DNA polymerase, and 1 μL of PCRI product. The thermal cycles of PCR II: 95°C for 15 min (initial activation); 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec 61°C for 30 sec, and 72°C for 1 min; and 72°C for 10 min (final extension). DNA amplification was done using the PCR machine (BioRad) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All parameters in the PCR reactions, including annealing temperature, primer concentration, enzyme concentration, annealing time, magnesium concentration, extension time, and cycle number of PCR, have been optimized before applying for clinical samples. Nested multiplex PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis using gel agarose 2% and colorized by GelRedTM. Nucleotide bands visualized by the UV trans-illumination of Gel Doc machine BioRad®. GeneRuler 50 bp DNA ladder (Thermo Scientific) used as marker size molecules.
Specificity and sensitivity of PCR
Nested multiplex PCR specificity was tested against DNA of some various pathogens potential causing false positive results including: Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Salmonella typhi, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecalis, Candida albicans, Epstein Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus, and varicella zoster virus. The sensitivity of nested multiplex PCR was performed using distilled water solutions containing serial dilation (1/104- 1/1012) of purified T. pallidum DNA. This test was used to find the detection limit of DNA in the PCRreactions.
DNA sequencing
In order to verify nested multiplex PCR assays, the A2058G and A2059G mutations were confirmed by DNA sequencing.
RESULTS
Primer design
In this study, we designed three sets of primers (one set of primer for PCR 1 and two sets of primers for PCR 2). The second PCR will produce three DNA fragments with different length (Figure 1). One DNA segment (187 bp) indicates T. pallidum 23S rRNA gene. The other two of DNA segments (130 bp and 100 bp) indicated A2058G and A2059G mutations respectively.
Figure 1. Scheme illustrating primer positions and products (DNA segments) produced by first and second round of nested multiplex PCR. 130-bp and 100-bp DNA segments will be amplified if there is mutation A2058G and/or A2059G respectively. The 3’ end of primer forward (2058 F) and reverse (2059 R) have been designed that they can only hybrid with A2058G and A2059G mutations of 23S rRNA respectively. A 187-bp DNA segment will be amplified only from T. pallidum 23S rRNA gene (internal control for bacterial detection)
Optimization of nested multiplex PCR
Optimization of nested multiplex PCR reaction was conducted in order to obtain optimum PCR result. From optimization of the annealing temperature, the results showed that the optimum annealing temperature for the amplification (both PCR 1 and PCR 2) was 60.9°C (61°C). Optimization of primer concentration showed that concentration of 0.13 μM, 0.3 μM, 0.4 μM, and 0.47 μM for each primer, gave the optimum result (at total volume reaction of 20 μL). Optimization of enzyme concentration showed that 1.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase at a total reaction volume of 20 μl gave the optimum result. From optimization of the annealing time, the results showed that the optimum annealing time for the amplification was 30 seconds. Optimization of magnesium ion concentration showed that concentration 0.33 mM magnesium ion at a total reaction volume of 20 μL gave the optimum result. From the optimization of the number of cycles, the results showed that the optimum one was 35 cycles.
Specificity and sensitivity of nested multiplex PCR
To determine the specificity of nested multiplex PCR, we tested a panel of microorganisms including Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Salmonella typhi, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecalis, Candida albicans, Epstein Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus, and varicella zoster virus. The results showed no cross reacting with those microorganisms. Specificity of the primers was also analyzed by primer basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) program and showed no cross reacting with the DNA fragment from other microorganisms except T. pallidum. The detection limit of DNA of nested multiplex PCR was 4,400 DNA copy number.
Figure 2. Examples of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positive and negative results from whole blood samples. K- and K+: negative and positive controls. Positive control consisted of three DNA segments (187 bp, 130 bp and 100 bp). 187 bp: a DNA band indicating T. pallidum 23S rRNA gene (bacterial detection). 130 bp and 100 bp: DNA bands indicating A2058G and A2059G mutations respectively
Detection of T. pallidum in clinical specimens
PCR results showed that 13 of 45 whole blood specimens were positive T. pallidum 23S rRNA gene with no mutations (A2058G and/or A2059G)
Confirmation of PCR results by DNA sequencing
Two positive samples with no mutations were confirmed by DNA sequencing. The DNA sequencing results clarified that there were no mutations in 2058 and 2059 position of 23S rRNA gene and in accordance with PCR results.
Figure 3. An example of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequencing result from positive sample. Red circle shows adenine (A) in position 2058 and 2059 of T. pallidum 23S rRNA gene, indicating azithromycin-sensitive T. pallidum
DISCUSSION
The inability to cultivate T. pallidum on artificial medium and the limitations of conventional methods for direct detection of pathogenic treponemes in clinical specimens, have made clinical decision-making of syphilis is often based upon serological tests despite the fact that their results may not correlate with disease activity.18 The increased prevalence of azithromycinresistant T. pallidum indicates the importance of determining the sensitivity of T. pallidum to antibiotic. The sensitivity test using conventional method cannot be conducted because the inability to cultivate T. pallidum on artificial medium. As a result, molecular method would enable rapid detection to detect and identify mutations of T. pallidum.
In this research, we developed a nested multiplex PCR using three primer sets to detect T. pallidum and to identify mutations (A2058G and A2059G) of T. pallidum 23S rRNA gene that caused azithromycin and macrolide resistant T. pallidum. The 3’end of primers (2058F and 2059R) were designed to hybrid only at A2058G and 2059 positions of 23S rRNA gene resistant T. pallidum. Besides the mutation identifications, the assay also could detect the T. pallidum that was indicated by a 187-bp DNA segment (Figure 1). The PCR method to detect the mutations of 23S rRNA has also been developed by other researchers with different approaches. Lukehart et al.7 developed a conventional method for the detection of A2058G mutation used a nested PCR followed by MboII restriction enzyme digestion and agarose gel electrophoresis. An additional restriction enzyme (BsaI) is needed to detect the A2059G mutation as developed by Matejkova et al6 and Chen et al19 developed a real-time multiplex PCR to simultaneously detect both mutations without two separate enzymatic digestions.
All parameters in the PCR reactions including annealing temperature, primer concentration, enzyme concentration, annealing time, magnesium ion concentration, extension time, and cycle number of PCR were optimized to obtain ideal results. There is no single protocol or single set of conditions that is optimal for all PCR.20,21 Therefore, each new PCR application is likely to require specific optimization to overcome problems, such as no detectable or low yield of PCR product, the presence of nonspecific bands or smeary background; the formation of “primer-dimers” that compete with the chosen template/primer set for amplification; or mutations caused by errors in nucleotide incorporation.20,21 Furthermore, syphilis specimens, such as blood, may contain extremely low concentrations of treponemes.18 It was, therefore, essential to improve an assay’s sensitivity with optimization of some parameters such as annealing temperature, primer concentration, enzyme concentration, annealing time, magnesium ion concentration, extension time, and cycle number of PCR.20–22
To determine the specificity of nested multiplex PCR, we tested a panel of microorganisms including Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumonia, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia, Salmonella typhi, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecali, Candida albicans, Epstein Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus, and varicella zoster virus. The results showed no cross reacting with those microorganisms. Chen et al19 determined the specificity of the triplex PCR assay with DNA extracted from an in-house specificity panel comprising closely related T. pallidum subsp. endemicum and T. pallidum subsp. pertenue, nonpathogenic treponemes (T. denticola, T. refringens, and T. phagedenis), and pathogenic and commensal genital tract microorganisms, as well as normal skin flora. The number microorganisms for specificity study were limited. However, the specificity of the primers were also analyzed by primer-BLAST program and showed no cross reacting with DNA fragment from other microorganisms beside T. pallidum. We recommend that it is important to perform the specificity test against larger representative microorganisms in the future.
From the sensitivity test, we found that the detection limit of DNA of the assay was 4,400 DNA copy numbers. This result was different from Liu et al23 and Orle et al24 which had a sensitivity of 10 organisms. These differences might occur as a result of using different gene target, set primers or specimen in each study. Liu et al23 and Orle et al24 using polA as gene target and swab from genital ulcer as sample. Many studies showed that swab from genital ulcer specimens or from skin active lesions have better sensitivity than blood specimens.10,25,26 However, in this study we could not obtain the skin specimens because not all of patients showed wet skin lesion; thus, we only obtained the whole blood samples. Although the sensitivity of T. pallidum bacteremia detection is lower, it varies according to stage.10 Moreover, we also used more than one primer pair (three sets of primers) that might affect the sensitivity assay.27
A total 13 of 45 whole blood specimens were PCR positive for T. pallidum, and no single point mutation (either A2058G or A2059G) were detected. Nested multiplex PCR could only detect mutations from positive control that always ran parallel with PCR reactions from samples. This result was different from other studies of mutations A2058G and A2059Gof 23S rRNA gene that caused azithromycin and macrolide resistant T. pallidum. Studies from many countries showed the increase of resistant T. pallidum strain.2,3,9,10 It is not enough evidence to conclude that resistance strains of T. pallidum do not emerge in Indonesia because of the samples we tested only taken from one city that is Jakarta. We suggest to conduct further studies by using clinical specimens from other provinces in Indonesia to obtain national data of azithromycin-resistant T. pallidum.
In conclusion, we have developed nested multiplex PCR for simultaneous detection and identification of A2058G and A2059G mutations 23S rRNA T. pallidum gene by using three sets of primers. This assay has been optimized to obtain the optimal condition of PCR with high specificity and sensitivity. Optimized PCR have been tested for clinical specimens and showed the same results as confirmatory DNA sequencing. Based on this study, the PCR developed is potential to apply for clinical specimen.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Acknowledgment
This research was funded by PUPT DIKTI 2015- 2016. We thank the team of Microbiology and Dermatology-Venereology Department for cooperation and technical assistance. We also thank the STD clinic of Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, the STD clinic of Puskesmas Pasar Rebo, the STD clinic of Tambora, and PKBI Jatinegara for their contribution and cooperation.
REFERENCES
Copyright @ 2017 Authors. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited.
mji.ui.ac.id