A randomized clinical trial of nasogastric tube insertion in intubated patient: comparison between finger method and reverse Sellick maneuver

  • Rahendra Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Aida Rosita Tantri Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Liliana Mangkuwerdojo Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: finger, nasogastric, reverse Sellick
Abstract viewed: 354 times
PDF downloaded: 124 times
HTML downloaded: 18 times
EPUB downloaded: 103 times

Abstract

BACKGROUND Finger method is a new simple technique of nasogastric tube (NGT) insertion for intubated patients which only requires the practitioner’s own fingers. This study was aimed to compare the feasibility of finger method and the standard reverse Sellick maneuver in NGT insertion for intubated patients.

METHODS This was a single-blinded, randomized clinical trial that included 210 patients aged 18–65 years old who were intubated under general anesthesia and needed NGT insertion. Initially, subjects were randomly allocated by the third party into two groups: subjects who had NGT insertion with finger method and those with reverse Sellick maneuver. Success rate of NGT insertion at the first attempt, duration of the procedure, and complication rate of blood spots were all recorded. Chi-square test and Mann–Whitney analysis were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS Success rate of NGT insertion at the first attempt in finger method group was higher in comparison with reverse Sellick maneuver group (81.6% versus 60%, respectively, p = 0.002). Likewise, the median of NGT insertion duration was longer in finger group compared to reverse Sellick maneuver group (13 sec versus 12 sec, respectively, p < 0.001) but it was not clinically significant. Moreover, the complication rate of blood spots found during the procedure was lower in subjects with finger method than with reverse Sellick maneuver (10.7% versus 28%, respectively, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS Using finger method was more feasible than reverse Sellick maneuvers in NGT insertion.

References

  1. Moharari RS, Fallah AH, Khajavi MR, Khashayar P, Lakeh MM, Najafi A. The GlideScope facilitates nasogastric tube insertion: a randomized clinical trial. Anesth Analg. 2010;110(1):115-8. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181be0e43

  2. Ghatak T, Samanta S, Baronia AK. A new technique to insert nasogastric tube in an unconscious intubated patient. N Am J Med Sci. 2013;5(1):68-70. https://doi.org/10.4103/1947-2714.106215

  3. Siddhartha BSV, Sharma NGA, Kamble S, Shankaranarayana P. Nasogastric tube insertion in anesthetized intubated patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomies: a comparative study of three techniques. Anesth Essays Res. 2017;11(3):550-3. https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_41_17

  4. Tsai YF, Luo CF, Illias A, Lin CC, Yu HP. Nasogastric tube insertion in anesthetized and intubated patients: a new and reliable method. BMC Gastroenterol. 2012;12:99. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-12-99

  5. Illias AM, Hui YL, Lin CC, Chang CJ, Yu HP. A comparison of nasogastric tube insertion techniques without using other instruments in anesthetized and intubated patients. Ann Saudi Med. 2013;33(5):476-81. https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2013.476

  6. Mandal MC, Dolai S, Ghosh S, Mistri PK, Roy R, Basu SR, et al. Comparison of four techniques of nasogastric tube insertion in anaesthetised, intubated patients: a randomized controlled trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2014;58(6):714-8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.147157

  7. Marsaban AH, Tantri AR, Amri R. Comparison of feasibility in NGT insertion by standard technique and reverse Sellick maneuver in intubated patients under general anesthesia [thesis]. Jakarta (Indonesia): Universitas Indonesia; 2011. Indonesian.

  8. Chun DH, Kim NY, Shin YS, Kim SH. A randomized, clinical trial of frozen versus standard nasogastric tube placement. World J Surg. 2009;33(9):1789-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0144-x

  9. Appukutty J, Shroff PP. Nasogastric tube insertion using different techniques in anesthetized patients: a prospective, randomized study. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(3):832-5. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181af5e1f

  10. Fakhari S, Bilehjani I, Negargar S, Mirinazhad M, Azarfarin R. Split endotracheal tube as a guide tube for gastric tube insertion in anesthetized patients: a randomized clinical trial. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2009;1(1):17-22.

  11. Singer AJ, Konia N. Comparison of topical anesthetics and vasoconstrictors vs lubricants prior to nasogastric intubation: a randomized, controlled trial. Acad Emerg Med. 1999;6(3):184-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb00153.x

Published
2019-12-13
How to Cite
1.
Rahendra, Tantri AR, Mangkuwerdojo L. A randomized clinical trial of nasogastric tube insertion in intubated patient: comparison between finger method and reverse Sellick maneuver. Med J Indones [Internet]. 2019Dec.13 [cited 2020Jan.22];28(4):311-5. Available from: https://mji.ui.ac.id/journal/index.php/mji/article/view/2704
Section
Clinical Research