Microbiology aspect of wound infection: in-vitro test for efficacy of hydrophobic dressing in microorganism binding

Authors

  • Yeva Rosana
  • Beti E. Dewi
  • Conny R. Tjampakasari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13181/mji.v18i3.356

Keywords:

hydrophobicity, MRSA, Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Abstract

Aim To do in vitro test to assess the efficacy of hydrophobic dressing Cutimed®Sorbact® to bind multiresistant bacteria that caused wound infection, the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Method This was a cross sectional study that was conducted in the Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia, on January 2009. In-vitro testing of sterile hydrophobic dressing to bind microorganisms was conducted by counting MRSA and Pseudomonas aeruginosa that were bound to 1 square centimetre of single layer sterile hydrophobic dressing (Cutimed®Sorbact® ). Every test was done in triplicate at 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours. To compare the hydrophobic dressing capability to bind microorganisms, in vitro testing of sterile conventional dressing to bind microorganisms on 0.5 minutes and 2 hours was done.

Result The binding capacity of sterile hydrophobic dressing began at 0.5 minutes and teached a maximum at 2 hours. Compared with conventional dressing, sterile hydrophobic dressing had more binding capability to MRSA and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Conclusion Hydrophobic dressing (Cutimed®Sorbact® ) had a higher capability to bind MRSA and Pseudomonas aeruginosa compared to conventional dressing. (Med J Indones 2009;18:155-60)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2009-08-01

How to Cite

1.
Rosana Y, Dewi BE, Tjampakasari CR. Microbiology aspect of wound infection: in-vitro test for efficacy of hydrophobic dressing in microorganism binding. Med J Indones [Internet]. 2009Aug.1 [cited 2024Nov.19];18(3):155-60. Available from: https://mji.ui.ac.id/journal/index.php/mji/article/view/356

Issue

Section

Basic Medical Research
Abstract viewed = 1008 times

Most read articles by the same author(s)