Photogrammetrics and clinical features of nasal siliconoma in Asians

  • Krista Ekaputri Hayandra Clinic, Jakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9959-0634
  • Theddeus Octavianus Hari Prasetyono Department of Surgery, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia; Indonesian Clinical Training and Education Center (ICTEC), Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3675-4309
Keywords: Asia, face, nose, photogrammetry, silicones
Abstract viewed: 198 times
PDF downloaded: 0 times
HTML downloaded: 0 times
EPUB downloaded: 0 times

Abstract

BACKGROUND Nasal silicone injections have been a common procedure among Asians. However, this procedure can lead to severe complications. Unfortunately, there are limited data available on the distortive characteristics of nasal siliconoma in the Asian population. This study aimed to provide objective data on the distortive characteristics of nasal siliconoma to be a reference for a treatment outcome.

METHODS This cross-sectional study was conducted at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital from June 2017 to March 2018. The study included 30 Asian females with nasal siliconoma, and nasal photogrammetric measurements were taken using a portable mirror stand device and analyzed to formulate the distortive characteristics.

RESULTS The mean (standard deviation) of intercanthal width was 3.33 (0.25) cm, nasal root width was 2.70 (0.30) cm, alar width was 4.48 (0.31) cm, two tip-defining points (TDP) distance was 2.09 (0.22) cm, nasofrontal angle was 141.10 (8.40)°, length of the nose was 3.10 (0.48) cm, nasofacial angle was 32.94 (4.51)°, nasion projection was 0.64 (0.36) cm, pronasion projection was 2.00 (0.25–2.46) cm, tip angle was 122.7 (4.52)°, nasolabial angle was 78.81 (15.93)°, columella length (n = 20) was 0.64 (0.20) cm, tip lobular portion length was 1.12 (0.20) cm, the extend of extended columella was 0.47 (0.31) cm, and base of the nasal width was 3.98 (0.25) cm.

CONCLUSIONS Nasal siliconoma in Asians had certain characteristics such as a wider nasal root, wider two TDP distance, wider nasion projection, acute nasolabial angle, hanging columella, and a long lobular portion of the tip.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. McCurdy JA Jr. Considerations in Asian cosmetic surgery. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2007;15(3):387-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2007.05.001

  2. Rohrich RJ, Potter JK. Liquid injectable silicone: is there a role as a cosmetic soft-tissue filler? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113(4):1239-41. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000118022.71802.78

  3. Peters W, Fornasier V. Complications from injectable materials used for breast augmentation. Can J Plast Surg. 2009;17(3):89-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/229255030901700305

  4. Bravo VS, de Balassiano LK, de Bastos JT, da Rocha CR, Costa MB, de Freire Cassia F, et al. Siliconoma: report of two cases. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2006;40(2):288-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-016-0618-9

  5. Legaspi-Vicerra ME, Field LM. Paraffin granulomata, "witch's chin," and nasal deformities: excision and reconstruction with reduction chinplasty and open rhinotomy resection. J Clin AesthetDermathol. 2010;3(6):54-8.

  6. Prasetyono TOH, Karina. Morphometry of deuteromalay female nose. Med J Indones. 2009;18(2):120-3. https://doi.org/10.13181/mji.v18i2.349

  7. Supit L, Prasetyono TOH. A portable mirror stand for clinical facial photo documentation. Arch Plast Surg. 2015;42(3):356-60. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2015.42.3.356

  8. Leong SC, White PS. A comparison of aesthetic proportions between the Oriental and Caucasian nose. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004;29(6):672-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00891.x

  9. Park J, Suhk J, Nguyen AH. Nasal analysis and anatomy: anthropometry proportional assessment in Asians - aesthetic balance from forehead to chin, part II. Semin Plast Surg. 2015;29(4):226-31. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1564817

  10. Mommaerts MY, Moerenhout BA. Ideal proportions in full face front view, contemporary versus antique. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2011;39(2):107-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2010.04.012

  11. Rorich RJ, Adams Jr WP, Ahmad J. Correction of the boxy nasal tip using the open approach. In: Rohrich RJ, Adams WP, Gunter JP, editors. Dallas rhinoplasty: nasal surgery by the masters. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical; 2007:1.

  12. Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ, Friedman RM, Hackney FL. Importance of the alar-columellar relationship. In: Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ, Adams WP, editors. Dallas rhinoplasty: nasal surgery by the masters. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing; 2007. p. 401-9.

  13. Guyuron B, Ghavami A, Wishnek SM. Components of the short nostril. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116(5):1517-24.

  14. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000182590.01431.3d

Published
2023-06-15
How to Cite
1.
Ekaputri K, Prasetyono TOH. Photogrammetrics and clinical features of nasal siliconoma in Asians. Med J Indones [Internet]. 2023Jun.15 [cited 2024Jun.18];32(1):25-0. Available from: https://mji.ui.ac.id/journal/index.php/mji/article/view/6273
Section
Clinical Research