Radiological and histological assessment of a novel interlocking three-dimensional miniplate for mandibular angle fractures: an animal study

Authors

  • Prasetyanugraheni Kreshanti Doctoral Program in Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jaarta, Indonesia; Cleft and Craniofacial Center, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia; Research Center for Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Deni Noviana School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia
  • Bambang Pontjo Priosoeryanto School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia
  • Aria Kekalih Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Rahyussalim Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Sugeng Supriadi Research Center for Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
  • Mendy Juniaty Hatibie Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sam Ratulangi, Manado, Indonesia
  • Chaula Luthfia Sukasah Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13181/mji.oa.247567

Keywords:

animals, bone plates, laboratory, mandibular fracture
Abstract viewed: 0 times
PDF downloaded: 0 times
HTML downloaded: 0 times
EPUB downloaded: 0 times

Abstract

BACKGROUND Open reduction and internal fixation are considered the gold standard for managing mandibular fractures, as they effectively restore anatomical structure and functionality. Three-dimensional (3D) miniplates were developed to obtain a geometrically stable structure. However, the rigid structure of 3D miniplate may cause screw holes to be located within the fracture lines or directly above important anatomical structures. Hence, we have developed customizable interlocking 3D miniplates that allow for modifications in the configuration of the horizontal miniplates and vertical cross-struts to meet specific requirements.

METHODS This study included 24 goats divided into 2 groups: interlocking 3D miniplate and standard plate. Each group was further divided into subgroups sacrificed on Days 5, 28, and 56. Radiological assessments were performed to evaluate bone, muscle, peri-implant bone, and peri-implant muscle density. Histological assessments were performed using Masson's trichome (MT) for bone healing evaluation and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining for biocompatibility.

RESULTS Radiological assessment indicated an increase in density across all measured parameters from Day 5 to 56. Histological evaluation from MT staining showed a significantly higher fibrocartilage in the interlocking 3D miniplate group (6.109%, IQR 1.453–10.828) compared to standard plate (1.311%, IQR 0.636–2.553; p = 0.001). Furthermore, H&E staining showed significantly higher inflammatory cell counts in the standard group on Days 28 and 56 compared to the interlocking 3D miniplate group (p = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS This study concluded that the interlocking 3D miniplate showed better bone healing properties and biocompatibility than the standard plate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chatterjee A, Gunashekhar S, Karthic R, Karthika S, Edsor E, Nair RU. Comparison of single versus two non-compression miniplates in the management of unfavourable angle fracture of the mandible orginal research. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023;15(Suppl 1):S486−9. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_555_22

Louis PJ, Morlandt AB. Advancements in maxillofacial trauma: a historical perspective. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;76(11):2256−70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.08.021

Balani A, Saroj P, Kharsan V, Karan A, Mazhar H, Awasthy A. Management of mandibular angle and body fractures using miniplates and 3D plates. Bioinformation. 2024;20(6):605−9. https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300200605

Rastogi S, Paul S, Kukreja S, Aggarwal K, Choudhury R, Bhugra A, et al. Treatment of mandibular angle fractures with single three-dimensional locking miniplates without maxillomandibular fixation: how much fixation is required? Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2017;10(3):188−96. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1600904

Das MK, Mishra M, Singh G, Mondal S. Single linear miniplate versus rectangular grid plate in the treatment of mandibular angle fractures: a prospective, clinico-radiographic, comparative study. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2023;14(1):47−54. https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_129_22

Singh A, Arunkumar KV. Standard 3D titanium miniplate versus locking 3D miniplate in fracture of mandible: a prospective comparative study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2016;15(2):164−72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-015-0817-y

Yadav A. Principles of internal fixation in maxillofacial surgery. In: Bonanthaya K, Panneerselvam E, Manuel S, Kumar VV, Rai A, editors. Oral and maxillofacial surgery for the clinician. Singapore: Springer; 2021. p. 1039−51. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1346-6_51

Kreshanti P, Supriadi S, Kekalih A, Rahyussalim AJ, Priosoeryanto BP, Noviana D, et al. Novel design of interlocking 3-dimensional miniplate in mandibular angle fractures: an in vitro study. J Craniofac Surg. 2024;35(5):1591−6. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000010372

Marcus HJ, Bennett A, Chari A, Day T, Hirst A, Hughes-Hallett A, et al. IDEAL-D framework for device innovation: a consensus statement on the preclinical stage. Ann Surg. 2022;275(1):73−9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004907

Orassi V, Duda GN, Heiland M, Fischer H, Rendenbach C, Checa S. Biomechanical assessment of the validity of sheep as a preclinical model for testing mandibular fracture fixation devices. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:672176. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.672176

Wancket LM. Animal models for evaluation of bone implants and devices: comparative bone structure and common model uses. Vet Pathol. 2015;52(5):842−50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985815593124

Alizadeh S, Kamfar P, Hosseinchi M. Evaluation of radiological and anatomical features of skull bones in adult Saanen goat. Vet Med Sci. 2024;10(3):e1435. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.1435

Al-Tairi NH, Shoushan MM, Saad Khedr MM, Abd-alal SE. Comparison of three-dimensional plate versus double miniplate osteosynthesis for treatment of unfavorable mandibular angle fractures. Tanta Dent J. 2015;12(2): 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tdj.2015.02.001

Published

2025-02-10

How to Cite

1.
Kreshanti P, Noviana D, Priosoeryanto BP, Kekalih A, Rahyussalim, Supriadi S, Hatibie MJ, Sukasah CL. Radiological and histological assessment of a novel interlocking three-dimensional miniplate for mandibular angle fractures: an animal study. Med J Indones [Internet]. 2025Feb.10 [cited 2025Feb.20];33(4):207-12. Available from: https://mji.ui.ac.id/journal/index.php/mji/article/view/7567

Issue

Section

Basic Medical Research
Abstract viewed = 0 times
PDF downloaded = 0 times HTML downloaded = 0 times EPUB downloaded = 0 times