A case of mixed mechanism glaucoma: diagnostic and management challenges

Authors

  • Ferdy Iskandar Residency Program in Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3177-8224
  • Virna Dwi Oktariana Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0443-7694
  • Yulia Aziza Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8266-1974

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13181/mji.cr.258092

Keywords:

case management, case report, diagnosis, glaucoma

Abstract

Mixed mechanism glaucoma occurs when secondary causes contribute to glaucoma in an eye with preexisting primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or primary angle-closure glaucoma. This study highlights its diagnostic and management challenges. A 63-year-old female presented with blurry vision and right eye pain for 2 months. She had undergone cataract surgery in the right eye 6 months earlier and developed elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) afterward. Her visual acuity in the right eye was hand movements, and IOP was 34 mmHg despite medications. Examination revealed signs of uveitis, leading to a diagnosis of secondary glaucoma. A glaucoma drainage device (GDD) was implanted, successfully controlling IOP. Follow-up revealed POAG signs in the left eye, prompting a revised diagnosis of mixed mechanism glaucoma in the right eye. GDD implantation was effective, but continued monitoring remained essential to maintain the target IOP.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Schuster AK, Erb C, Hoffmann EM, Dietlein T, Pfeiffer N. The diagnosis and treatment of glaucoma. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020;117(13):225-34. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2020.0225

Tanna AP, Boland MV, Giaconi JA, Krishnan C, Lin SC, Medeiros FA, et al. Basic and clinical science course section 10: glaucoma. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2022-2023.

Allison K, Patel D, Alabi O. Epidemiology of glaucoma: the past, present, and predictions for the future. Cureus. 2020;12(11):e11686.

https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.11686

Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(11):2081-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013

Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia. [The state of glaucoma in Indonesia]. Jakarta: Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia; 2019. Indonesian.

Kalogeropoulos D, Sung VC. Pathogenesis of uveitic glaucoma. J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2018;12(3):125-38. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1236

Kalogeropoulos D, Sakkas H, Mohammed B, Vartholomatos G, Malamos K, Sreekantam S, et al. Ocular toxoplasmosis: a review of the current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Int Ophthalmol. 2022;42(1):295-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-01994-9

Bârcă IC, Dima V, Consuela-Mădălina G, Mihai BM, Salmen T, Bohîlțea RE. Ocular toxoplasmosis - case report and literature review. Ro J Infect Dis. 2021;24(4):198-202. https://doi.org/10.37897/RJID.2021.4.6

Călugăru D, Călugăru M. Etiology, pathogenesis, and diagnosis of neovascular glaucoma. Int J Ophthalmol 2022;15(6):1005-10. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2022.06.20

Gericke A, Mann C, Zadeh JK, Musayeva A, Wolff I, Wang M, et al. Elevated intraocular pressure causes abnormal reactivity of mouse retinal arterioles. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019;2019:9736047. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9736047

Senthil S, Dada T, Das T, Kaushik S, Puthuran GV, Philip R, et al. Neovascular glaucoma - a review. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021;69:525-34. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1591_20

Sinha S, Ganjei AY, McWatters Z, Lee D, Moster MR, Myers JS, et al. Ahmed versus Baerveldt glaucoma drainage device in uveitic glaucoma: a retrospective comparative study. J Glaucoma. 2020;29(9):750-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001583

Christakis PG, Kalenak JW, Tsai JC, Zurakowski D, Kammer JA, Harasymowycz PJ, et al. The Ahmed versus Baerveldt study: five-year treatment outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(10):2093-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.035

Purtskhvanidze K, Saeger M, Treumer F, Roider J, Nölle B. Long-term results of glaucoma drainage device surgery. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19(1):14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1027-z

Fargione RA, Tansuebchueasai N, Lee R, Tania Tai TY. Etiology and management of the hypertensive phase in glaucoma drainage-device surgery. Surv Ophthalmol. 2019;64(2):217-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2018.10.008

Chang MM, Yang CD, Ly HQ, Minckler DS, Lin KY. Anterior chamber washout during Ahmed valve glaucoma surgery reduces the incidence of hypertensive phase. J Glaucoma. 2023;32(5):333-39. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002215

Susanna R Jr, Vessani RM. Staging glaucoma patient: why and how? Open Ophthalmol J. 2009;3:59-64. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874364100903020059

Yu ZY, Wu L, Qu B. Changes in corneal endothelial cell density in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. World J Clin Cases. 2019;7(15):1978-85. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i15.1978

Lee WJ, Baek SU, Kim YK, Park KH, Jeoung JW. Rates of ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thinning in normal, open-angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma eyes: a trend-based analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60(2):599-604. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.18-25296

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

1.
Iskandar F, Oktariana VD, Aziza Y. A case of mixed mechanism glaucoma: diagnostic and management challenges. Med J Indones [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 29 [cited 2025 Dec. 30];34(4):285–92. Available from: https://mji.ui.ac.id/journal/index.php/mji/article/view/8092

Issue

Section

Case Report/Series