Perception of the Zika virus infection and its influence on Zika prevention practices by pregnant women at the Region 5 Health Promotion Center in Thailand

Issara Siramaneerat



DOI: https://doi.org/10.13181/mji.v27i3.2424

Abstract


Background: The Zika virus (ZIKA) infection in pregnant women causes microcephaly, a brain disorder resulting in severe birth defects. The objective of this study was to identify the factors that influence Zika prevention practices by pregnant women at the Region 5 Health Promotion Center in Thailand.

Methods: A cross-sectional study applied a survey method to collect data from pregnant women between 18 and 45 years of age. The sampling method used multistage random sampling. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression analysis.

Results: The findings indicated that 5 of 12 factors could significantly predict Zika prevention practices of pregnant women at the Health Promotion Center Region 5 in Thailand: education, smoking behavior, check-up status during pregnancy, perception of susceptibility, and perception of benefit.

Conclusion: The results show a direct correlation between the perception of susceptibility and benefit and Zika prevention practices. Policies for promoting Zika knowledge and preventive behavior by providing information about Zika should focus on changing the thoughts, attitudes, and beliefs of pregnant women and their families.

Keywords


perception, pregnant, Thailand, Zika

Full Text:

PDF

References


  1. Schuler-Faccini L, Ribeiro EM, Feitosa IM, Horovitz DD, Cavalcanti DP, Pessoa A, et al. Possible association between Zika virus infection and microcephaly — Brazil, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(3):59–62. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6503e2er
  2. Rasmussen SA, Jamieson DJ, Honein MA, Petersen LR. Zika virus and birth defects — reviewing the evidence for causality. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1981–7. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsr1604338
  3. Frieden TR, Schuchat A, Petersen LR. Zika virus 6 months later. JAMA. 2016;316:1443–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.11941
  4. Binsaeed AA, Al-Hajri M, Noureldin EM, Farag E, Malik SM, Al-Zedjali MS, et al. Zika virus strategic response framework for the Gulf states 2016: an urgent need for collaboration. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2016;46(3):571–80. https://doi.org/10.12816/0033978
  5. Polwiang S. The estimation of imported dengue virus from Thailand. J Travel Med. 2015;22(3):194–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtm.12193
  6. Wikan N, Suputtamongkol Y, Yoksan S, Smith DR, Auewarakul P. Immunological evidence of Zika virus transmission in Thailand. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2016;9(2):141–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjtm.2016.01.017
  7. Oliveira Melo AS, Malinger G, Ximenes R, Szejnfeld PO, Alves Sampaio S, Bispo de Filippis AM. Zika virus intrauterine infection causes fetal brain abnormality and microcephaly: tip of the iceberg?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(1):6–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15831
  8. Pearson E, Punpuing S, Jampaklay A, Kittisuksathit S, Prohmmo A. The Mekong Challenge: Underpaid, Overworked and Overlooked: The realities of young migrant workers in Thailand: Volume One. International Labour Organization (ILO) & the Institute for Social and Population Research (IPSR), Mahidol University. 2006.
  9. World Health Organization. The Kingdom of Thailand Health System Review, Health Systems in Transition, World Health Organization Asia Pacific Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Manila. 2015.
  10. World Desk Reference [Internet]. Thailand introduction. Bangkok: 2017 [cited 2017 June 28]. Available from: http://dev.prenhall.com/divisions/hss/worldreference/TH/introduction.html/
  11. Bureau of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health [Internet]. Report on major diseases and health hazards Health zone 5. Bangkok: 2017 [cited 2017 June 28]. Available from: https://odpc.ddc.moph.go.th/documents/1214115155.8282.pdf.
  12. Stretcher V, Rosenstock IM. The health belief model. Heal Behav Heal Educ Theory, Res Pract. 1997;31–6.
  13. Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Educ Q. 1988;15(2):175–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818801500203
  14. Busari OA, Olanrewaju TO, Desalu OO, Opadijo OG, Jimoh AK, Agboola SM, et al. Impact of patients' knowledge, attitude and practices on hypertension on compliance with antihypertensive drugs in a resource-poor setting. TAF Prev Med Bull. 2010;9(2):87–92.
  15. Petrie KJ, Weinman J. Patients' perceptions of their illness: the dynamo of volition in health care. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012;21(1):60–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411429456
  16. National Statistical Office Thailand [Internet]. Key Findings: The 2009 Reproductive Health Survey. Retrieved from: http://web.nso.go.th/en/survey/reprod/data/rhs09_100810.pdf
  17. Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. Determining sample size for research activities. Educ Psychol Meas. 1970;30(3):607–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
  18. Wong LP, Shakir SM, Atefi N, AbuBakar S. Factors affecting dengue prevention practices: nationwide survey of the Malaysian public. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0122890. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122890
  19. Saunders M, Lewis P, Thornhill A. Research methods for business students. Selecting samples. Pearson Education, England. 2009:210–56.
  20. Petersen EE, Staples JE, Meaney-Delman D, Fischer M, Ellington SR, Callaghan WM, et al. Interim guidelines for pregnant women during a Zika virus outbreak — United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(2):30–3. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6502e1er
  21. Whittemore K, Tate A, Illescas A, Saffa A, Collins A, Varma JK, et al. Zika virus knowledge among pregnant women who were in areas with active transmission. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(1):164–6. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2301.161614
  22. Besnard M, Lastère S, Teissier A, Cao-Lormeau VM, Musso D. Evidence of perinatal transmission of Zika virus, Frensh Polynesia, December 2013 and February 2014. Euro Surveill. 2014;19(13):pii=20751. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES2014.19.13.20751
  23. World Health Organization (WHO) [Internet]. Zika strategic response plan revised for July 2016–December 2017. [cited 2018 Jan 7]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/246091/1/WHO-ZIKV-SRF-16.3-eng.pdf.
  24. New Mexico Department of Health. Zika Preparedness and Response Plan December 1, 2016 [Internet]. New Mexico Department of Health All-Hazard Emergency Operations Plan Functional / Hazard-Specific Annex. [cited 2018 Jan 7]. Available from: https://nmhealth.org/publication/view/plan/2230/.
  25. Buathong R, Hermann L, Thaisomboonsuk B, Rutvisuttinunt W, Klungthong C, Chinnawirotpisan P, et al. Zika strategic response plan, 2012-2014. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;93:380–83. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.15-0022





Copyright (c) 2018 Issara Siramaneerat

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

All articles and issues in Medical Journal of Indonesia have unique DOI number registered in Crossref.
 
Romeo
 
http://mji.ui.ac.id/journal/index.php/mji/pages/view/stat 
Unique Visitors