Split cornea transplantation in anterior lamellar keratoplasty for limbal dermoid surgery: a case report

  • Dewinta Retno Kurniawardhani Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Syska Widyawati Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7119-5250
  • Rio Rhendy Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Evelina Kodrat Department of Pathological Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: cornea transplantation, dermoid cyst, host-graft reaction, keratoplasty, lamellar
Abstract viewed: 249 times
PDF downloaded: 200 times
HTML downloaded: 42 times
EPUB downloaded: 70 times

Abstract

Limbal dermoid is a rare congenital lesion that can impair vision and raise aesthetic concerns. Surgery is frequently required to reduce discomfort and enhance visual outcomes. A 20-year-old woman presented with a limbal dermoid measuring 4.5 mm in diameter and half the depth of the stroma. Excision was performed with anterior lamellar keratoplasty (ALK) using a post-Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft, which resulted in signs of graft failure. Re-surgery was then performed with post-Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty graft. It yielded a clear graft with good visual acuity. The first corneal graft utilized 95% of the graft thickness to cover 55% of the defect, leading to poor host-donor apposition. The second graft employed 55–65% to cover the same portion of the defect. The proportional thickness of the graft is crucial for a successful ALK. Split cornea transplantation produces respectable results; however, the corneal thickness must be carefully considered.

References

  1. Honavar SG, Manjandavida FP. Tumors of the ocular surface: a review. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2015;63(3):187-203. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.156912

  2. Ramesh V. Limbal dermoid on clinical presentation, but on histology was epidermal cyst. Bombay Hosp J. 2008;50(2):295-8.

  3. Zhong J, Deng Y, Zhang P, Li S, Huang H, Wang B, et al. New grading system for limbal dermoid: a retrospective analysis of 261 cases over a 10-year period. Cornea. 2018;37(1):66-71. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000001429

  4. Cho WH, Sung MT, Lin PW, Yu HJ. Progressive large pediatric corneal limbal dermoid management with tissue glue-assisted monolayer amniotic membrane transplantation: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(46):e13084. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013084

  5. Choudhary DS, Agrawal N, Hada M, Paharia N. Massive corneal-epibulbar dermoid managed with pre-descemetic DALK and SLET. GMS Ophthalmol Cases. 2021;11:Doc05.

  6. Lazzaro DR, Coe R. Repair of limbal dermoid with excision and placement of a circumlimbal pericardial graft. Eye Contact Lens. 2010;36(4):228-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0b013e3181e465bf

  7. Spierer O, Gologorsky D, Adler E, Forster RK. Lamellar keratoplasty with corneoscleral graft for limbal dermoids. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018;11(3):512-5.

  8. Cha DM, Shin KH, Kim KH, Kwon JW. Simple keratectomy and corneal tattooing for limbal dermoids: results of a 3-year study. Int J Ophthalmol. 2013;6(4):463-6.

  9. Pirouzian A. Management of pediatric corneal limbal dermoids. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:607-14. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S38663

  10. Wu KI, Chu HS, Pai AS, Hou YC, Lin SY, Chen WL, et al. Surgical management of limbal dermoids using anterior corneal buttons from descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty donor tissue as patch grafts. Cornea. 2017;36(1):64-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000001021

  11. Shen YD, Chen WL, Wang IJ, Hou YC, Hu FR. Full-thickness central corneal grafts in lamellar keratoscleroplasty to treat limbal dermoids. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(11):1955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.06.015

  12. Shimmura S. Component surgery of the cornea. Cornea. 2004;23(8 Suppl):S31-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ico.0000136669.05036.d8

  13. Al-Torbak A, Malak M, Teichmann KD, Wagoner MD. Presumed stromal graft rejection after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea. 2005;24(2):241-3. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ico.0000141230.95601.95

  14. Borderie VM, Guilbert E, Touzeau O, Laroche L. Graft rejection and graft failure after anterior lamellar versus penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(6):1024-9.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.01.007

  15. Panda A, Vanathi M, Kumar A, Dash Y, Priya S. Corneal graft rejection. Surv Ophthalmol. 2007;52(4):375-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2007.04.008

  16. Godeiro KD, Coutinho AB, Pereira PR, Fernandes BF, Cassie A, Burnier MN Jr. Histopathological diagnosis of corneal button specimens: an epidemiological study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2007;14(2):70-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/09286580600954330

  17. Gonzalez A, Price MO, Feng MT, Lee C, Arbelaez JG, Price FW Jr. Immunologic rejection episodes after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: incidence and risk factors. Cornea. 2017;36(9):1076-82. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000001223

  18. Vignery A. Macrophage fusion: molecular mechanisms. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;475:149-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-250-2_9

  19. Brodbeck WG, Anderson JM. Giant cell formation and function. Curr Opin Hematol. 2009;16(1):53-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOH.0b013e32831ac52e

  20. Wilson SL, Sidney LE, Dunphy SE, Rose JB, Hopkinson A. Keeping an eye on decellularized corneas: a review of methods, characterization and applications. J Funct Biomater. 2013;4(3):114-61. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb4030114

  21. Huang AJ, Li DQ, Li CH, Shang TY, Hernandez E. Modulation of corneal vascularization. Ocul Surf. 2005;3(4 Suppl):S190-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1542-0124(12)70253-7

  22. Azar DT. Corneal angiogenic privilege: angiogenic and antiangiogenic factors in corneal avascularity, vasculogenesis, and wound healing (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2006;104:264-302.

  23. Hori J, Yamaguchi T, Keino H, Hamrah P, Maruyama K. Immune privilege in corneal transplantation. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2019;72:100758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2019.04.002

  24. Vajpayee RB, Sharma N, Jhanji V, Titiyal JS, Tandon R. One donor cornea for 3 recipients: a new concept for corneal transplantation surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(4):552-4. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.125.4.552

  25. Sharma N, Agarwal P, Titiyal JS, Kumar C, Sinha R, Vajpayee RB. Optimal use of donor corneal tissue: one cornea for two recipients. Cornea. 2011;30(10):1140-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e318209d23c

  26. Heindl LM, Riss S, Bachmann BO, Laaser K, Kruse FE, Cursiefen C. Split cornea transplantation for 2 recipients: a new strategy to reduce corneal tissue cost and shortage. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(2):294-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.05.025

  27. Jhanji V, Mehta JS, Sharma N, Sharma B, Vajpayee RB. Targeted corneal transplantation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012;23(4):324-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e32835484a1

  28. Sati A, Shankar S, Jha A, Gurunadh VS. Customised component corneal transplantation: a blessing for three patients. BMJ Case Rep. 2014;2014:bcr2014205579. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2014-205579

Published
2023-08-04
How to Cite
1.
Kurniawardhani DR, Widyawati S, Rhendy R, Kodrat E. Split cornea transplantation in anterior lamellar keratoplasty for limbal dermoid surgery: a case report. Med J Indones [Internet]. 2023Aug.4 [cited 2024May17];32(1):58-3. Available from: http://mji.ui.ac.id/journal/index.php/mji/article/view/6824
Section
Case Report/Series