Touch DNA viability on various substrates from different shedder levels
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13181/mji.oa.247398Keywords:
DNA profiling, forensic science, sampling methods, touchAbstract
BACKGROUND Touch DNA samples are frequently discovered at crime scenes, including those found at the scene, on the victim, with the suspect, or on objects related to the incident. This study aimed to investigate 3 key factors affecting touch DNA samples: the characteristics person that shed the DNA, surfaces variants where the DNA was deposited, and different sampling methods effectiveness that influence DNA quantity, quality, and detection.
METHODS 9 participants grouped into high, intermediate, and low shedder levels simultaneously tied 2 types of ropes, non-porous and porous. The first person will hold a rope for 5 min then pass it to the second person to hold on the same spot for another 5 min. DNA was collected from each rope using the double swab and tape-lift method, extracted, and quantified using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Touch DNA profile at 20 short tandem repeat loci was amplified in PCR system and detected on capillary electrophoresis.
RESULTS Type of substrate (p = 0.97) or sampling method (p = 0.053) used for touch DNA collection did not significantly impact the DNA yield or profiling outcomes. A notable difference (p<0.001) was found in DNA quantity between high, intermediate, and low shedders, regardless of the substrate or method used.
CONCLUSIONS Individual shedder level has a greater influence on the results of touch DNA analysis regarding the DNA quantity and profiling quality than substrate type and sample procedure.
Downloads
References
Yudianto A, Sispitasri YE, Margaret N. Analysis of earphone swab mithocondrial DNA as an alternative material for identification examination. Folia Med Indones. 2016;52(3):169-73. https://doi.org/10.20473/fmi.v52i3.5446
Yudianto A, Setiawan F. The effectiveness of mini primer STR CODIS in DNA degradation as the effect of high-temperature exposure. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst). 2020;2020:2417693. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2417693
Butler JM. Fundamentals of forensic DNA typing. California: Elsevier; 2010.
Yudianto A, Margaret N. Effect of room temperature on the quality of DNA from earphone swab by observing mithocondrial DNA [mtDNA] D-loop region of 126 bp (HVS II, nt 34-159) and 143 bp (HVS I, nt 16268-16410). Folia Med Indones. 2017;53(2):86-93. https://doi.org/10.20473/fmi.v53i2.6342
Yudianto A, M IN, Furqoni AH, Nzilibili SM, Harjanto P. The use of touch DNA analysis in forensic identification focusing on short tandem repeat-combined DNA index system loci THO1, CSF1PO and TPOX. Infect Dis Rep. 2020;12(Suppl 1):8716. https://doi.org/10.4081/idr.2020.8716
Martin B, Blackie R, Taylor D, Linacre A. DNA profiles generated from a range of touched sample types. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018;36:13-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.06.002
Alketbi SK. The affecting factors of touch DNA. J Forensic Res. 2018;9(3):1000424. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7145.1000424
Alketbi SK, Goodwin W. The effect of surface type, collection and extraction methods on touch DNA. Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser. 2019;7(1):704-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2019.10.145
Alketbi SK, Goodwin W. The effect of time and environmental conditions on touch DNA. Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser. 2019;7(1):701-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2019.10.144
Hefetz I, Einot N, Faerman M, Horowitz M, Almog J. Touch DNA: the effect of the deposition pressure on the quality of latent fingermarks and STR profiles. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019;38:105−12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.10.016
Sessa F, Salerno M, Bertozzi G, Messina G, Ricci P, Ledda C, et al. Touch DNA: impact of handling time on touch deposit and evaluation of different recovery techniques: an experimental study. Sci Rep. 2019;9(9542). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46051-9
Alketbi SK. The impact of collection method on touch DNA collected from fabric. J Forensic Sci Crim Investig. 2022;15(5):555922. https://doi.org/10.19080/JFSCI.2022.15.555923
Alketbi SK, Goodwin W. Touch DNA collection techniques for non-porous surfaces using cotton and nylon swabs. Biomed J Sci Tech Res. 2021;36(3):28608-12. https://doi.org/10.26717/BJSTR.2021.36.005863
Alketbi SK, Goodwin W. The impact of area size and fabric type on touch DNA collected from fabric. J Forensic Sci & Criminal Inves. 2022;16(1):555926. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4370445
Goray M, van Oorschot RA. Shedder status: exploring means of determination. Sci Justice. 2021;61(4):391−400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2021.03.004
Jansson L, Swensson M, Gifvars E, Hedell R, Forsberg C, Ansell R, et al. Individual shedder status and the origin of touch DNA. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2022;56:102626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2021.102626
Lee LY, Tan J, Lee YS, Syn CK. Shedder status-an analysis over time and assessment of various contributing factors. J Forensic Sci. 2023;68(4):1292−301. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15266
Schwender M, Bamberg M, Dierig L, Kunz SN, Wiegand P. The diversity of shedder tests and a novel factor that affects DNA transfer. Int J Legal Med. 2021;135(4):1267−80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-021-02533-y
Tan J, Lee JY, Lee LY, Aw ZQ, Chew MH, Ishak NI, et al. Shedder status: does it really exist? Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser. 2019;7(1):360-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2019.10.012
Pereira DA, Faria BM, Gonçalves RA, Carvalho VB, Prata KO, Saraiva PS, et al. [Relationship between muscular strength and functional capacity in patients with peripheral occlusive arterial disease: a pilot study]. J Vasc Bras. 2011;10(1):26-30. Brazilian. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-54492011000100005
Farmen RK, Jaghø R, Cortez P, Frøyland ES. Assessment of individual shedder status and implication for secondary DNA transfer. Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser. 2008;1(1):415-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2007.08.015
Saunders SK. Internal validation of the applied Biosystems® GlobalFilerTM express PCR amplification kit [Internet]. Marshall University Forensic Science Center; 2012 [cited 2024 May 15]. Available from: https://www.marshall.edu/forensics/files/SAUNDERSSHANNA-Research-Paper-7-31-13.pdf.
Vieira-Silva C, Afonso-Costa H, Ribeiro T, Porto MJ, Dias M, Amorim A. Quantifiler® trio DNA validation and usefulness in casework samples. Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser. 2015:5:e246−7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2015.09.098
Burrill J, Daniel B, Frascione N. A review of trace "Touch DNA" deposits: variability factors and an exploration of cellular composition. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019;39:8−18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.11.019
Tozzo P, Mazzobel E, Marcante B, Delicati A, Caenazzo L. Touch DNA sampling methods: efficacy evaluation and systematic review. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(24):15541. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232415541
Lehmann VJ, Mitchell RJ, Ballantyne KN, van Oorschot RA. Following the transfer of DNA: how far can it go? Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser. 2013;4(1):e53-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2013.10.027
Verdon TJ, Mitchell RJ, van Oorschot RA. Evaluation of tapelifting as a collection method for touch DNA. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014;8(1):179−86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.09.005
Butler JM. Forensic DNA testing. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2011;2011(12):1438−50. https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.top066928
Fonneløp AE, Ramse M, Egeland T, Gill P. The implications of shedder status and background DNA on direct and secondary transfer in an attack scenario. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017;29:48−60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.03.019
Manoli P, Antoniou A, Bashiardes E, Xenophontos S, Photiades M, Stribley V, et al. Sex-specific age association with primary DNA transfer. Int J Legal Med. 2016;130(1):103−12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-015-1291-2
Machado M, Hadgraft J, Lane ME. Assessment of the variation of skin barrier function with anatomic site, age, gender and ethnicity. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2010;32(6):397−409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2494.2010.00587.x
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Vira Saamia, Ahmad Yudianto, Muktiningsih Nurjayadi, Novitasari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Medical Journal of Indonesia agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant Medical Journal of Indonesia right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License that allows others to remix, adapt, build upon the work non-commercially with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in Medical Journal of Indonesia.
- Authors are permitted to copy and redistribute the journal's published version of the work non-commercially (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Medical Journal of Indonesia.