Management of bladder stones: the move towards non-invasive treatment

  • Isaac A. Deswanto Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta
  • Ari Basukarno Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta
  • Ponco Birowo Department of Urology, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta
  • Nur Rasyid Department of Urology, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta
Keywords: Bladder stone, cystholithotripsy, ESWL, sectio alta
Abstract viewed: 1825 times
PDF downloaded: 1432 times

Abstract

Background: Bladder stone accounts for 5% of all cases of urolithiasis. Bladder stones management has evolved over the last decades from open bladder surgery (sectio alta) to intracorporeal cystholithotripsy as well as extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). ESWL presents to be a promising modality in the management of bladder calculi due to its simplicity and well tolerability. This study is thus conducted to present data on the safety and effectiveness of ESWL in the management of bladder stone patients.

Methods: This is a retrospective study evaluating the medical records of 92 bladder calculi patients admitted to Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital (RSCM) from January 2011 to April 2015. Patient’s age, gender, type of stone and procedure being done, status of stone disintegration, length of hospital stay, and any complications that may occur are noted down and statistically analyzed using SPSS v. 20.

Results: Majority of the patients underwent ESWL (49 out of 92, 53.3%). The stone free rates for ESWL, intracorporeal lithotripsy, and sectio alta are 93.9%, 97.0% and 100% respectively. One patient had to repeat ESWL. The ESWL group had the smallest stone size average compared to the intracorporeal lithotripsy and section alta group (2.5 cm±2.0 cm vs 4.8 cm±3.7 cm vs 7.4 cm±5.4 cm respectively). The ESWL sessions were conducted in the outpatient clinic, and thus no hospital stay was required.

Conclusion: ESWL can be suggested as an effective non-invasive approach in the disintegration of bladder stone of ≤25 mm with a promisingly high stone-free rate (93.9%) Furthermore, ESWL can be performed on an outpatient basis with minimal complications.

References

  1. Schwartz BF, Stoller ML. The vesical calculus. Urol Clin. 2000;27(2):333–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70262-7

  2. Papatsoris AG, Varkarakis I, Dellis A, Deliveliotis C. Bladder lithiasis: from open surgery to lithotripsy. Urol Res. 2006;34(3):163–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-006-0045-5

  3. Grases F, Costa-Bauzá A, Gomila I, Serra-Trespalle S, Alonso-Sainz F, del Valle JM. Melamine Urinary Bladder Stone. Urology. 2009;73(6):1262–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2008.12.041

  4. Sofer M, Kaver I, Greenstein A, Bar Yosef Y, Mabjeesh NJ, Chen J, et al. Refinements in treatment of large bladder calculi: simultaneous percutaneous suprapubic and transurethral cystolithotripsy. Urology. 2004;64(4):651–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.067

  5. Shah HN, Hegde SS, Shah JN, Mahajan AP, Bansal MB. Simultaneous transurethral cystolithotripsy with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a prospective feasibility study and review of literature. BJU Int. 2007;99(3):595–600. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06570.x

  6. Kara C, Resorlu B, Cicekbilek I, Unsal A. Transurethral cystolithotripsy with holmium laser under local anesthesia in selected patients. Urology. 2009;74(5):1000–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.05.095

  7. Philippou P, Moraitis K, Masood J, Junaid I, Buchholz N. The management of bladder lithiasis in the modern era of endourology. Urology. 2012;79(5):980–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2011.09.014

  8. El-Halwagy S, Osman Y, Sheir KZ. Shock wave lithotripsy of vesical stones in patients with infravesical obstruction: an underused noninvasive approach. Urology. 2013;81(3):508–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.11.027

  9. Bhatia V, Biyani C. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for vesical lithiasis : initial experience. Br J Urol. 1993;71(6):695–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.1993.tb16068.x

  10. Husain I, el-Faqih SR, Shamsuddin A, Atassi R. Primary extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in management of large bladder calculi. J Endourol. 1994;8(3):183–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.1994.8.183

  11. Kostakopoulos A, Stavropoulos NJ, Makrichoritis C, Picramenos D, Deliveliotis C. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy for bladder stones. Int Urol Nephrol. 1996;28(2):157–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02550854

  12. Sharma R, Dill CE, Gelman DY. Urinary bladder calculi. J Emerg Med. 2011;41(2):185–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.02.032

  13. Chen Y, DeVivo MJ, Lloyd LK. Bladder stone incidence in persons with spinal cord injury: determinants and trends, 1973-1996. Urology. 2001;58(5):665–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(01)01374-7

  14. Benway BM, Bhayani SB. Lower urinary tract calculi. Campbell-walsh urology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders. 2007. p. 2521–2527.

  15. Sánchez-Martín FM, Hostalot AM, Santillana JM, Angerri O, Millán F, Villavicencio H. Extraction of a bladder stone in a child as described by the renaissance physician Cristóbal Méndez. Actas Urol Esp. 2014;38(7):476–82. Spanish. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuro.2014.02.002

  16. Philippou P, Volanis D, Kariotis I, Serafetinidis E, Delakas D. Prospective comparative study of endoscopic management of bladder lithiasis: is prostate surgery a necessary adjunct? Urology. 2011;78(1):43–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.10.035

  17. Bhatia V, Biyani CS. A comparative study of cystolithotfipsy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy for bladder stones. Int Urol Nephrol. 1994;26(1):27–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768241

  18. McAteer JA, Evan AP. The acute and long-term adverse effects of shock wave lithotripsy. Semin Nephrol. 2010;28(2):200–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semnephrol.2008.01.003

  19. Sun XZ, Zhang ZW. Shock wave lithotripsy for uric acid stones. Asian J Surg. 2006;29(1):36–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60292-X

  20. Al-ansari A, Shamsodini A, Younis N, Jaleel OA, Al-Rubaiai A, Shokeir AA. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy for treatment of patients with urethral and bladder stones presenting with acute urinary retention. Urology. 2005;66(6):1169–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.069

  21. Telha KA, Alkohlany K, Alnono I. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy monotherapy for treating patients with bladder stones. Arab J Urol. 2016;14(3):207–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2016.06.001

  22. Kilciler M, Sümer F, Bedir S, Ozgök Y, Erduran D. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment in paraplegic patients with bladder stones. Int J Urol. 2002;9(11):632–4. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2042.2002.00529.x

Published
2017-08-18
How to Cite
1.
Deswanto IA, Basukarno A, Birowo P, Rasyid N. Management of bladder stones: the move towards non-invasive treatment. Med J Indones [Internet]. 2017Aug.18 [cited 2019Nov.12];26(2):128-33. Available from: https://mji.ui.ac.id/journal/index.php/mji/article/view/1602
Section
Clinical Research