Determinants of low APGAR score among preeclamptic deliveries in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital: a retrospective cohort study in 2014

Sulaeman A. Susilo, Karina N. Pratiwi, Adly N.A. Fattah, Rima Irwinda, Noroyono Wibowo



DOI: https://doi.org/10.13181/mji.v24i3.1229

Abstract


Background: Preeclampsia has great implication on adverse neonatal outcome. Appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, respiration (APGAR) score at 1 or 5 minutes is one of the indicators of physiologic maturity of the infant. Therefore, the aim of this study was to know the correlation of APGAR score in preeclamptic deliveries with its risk factors.

Methods: This study was a retrospective cohort. Data were collected from January to December 2013 including all preeclamptic women with singleton live pregnancies who delivered their babies in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta. The primary outcome was APGAR score. There were some determinants conducted in this study. Binary logistic was used as multivariate analysis to analyze the correlation between APGAR score and risk factors of preeclampsia, data were analyzed using chi square test.

Results: Out of 450 preeclamptic women, 446 of them met the inclusion criteria. Low APGAR scores at 1 and 5 minutes were found in 19% (86/446) and 5.4% (24/446) of neonates respectively. Early onset of preeclampsia (adjusted OR = 4.577; 95% CI = 2.147 - 9.757), white blood cell ≥ 15,000/μL (adjusted OR = 3.315; 95% CI = 1.738 – 6.324), HELLP syndrome (adjusted OR = 2.00; 95% CI = 1.38 – 2.91) were independent risk factors for having infant with low APGAR score at 1 minute. Meanwhile, there was no significant risk factors at 5 minutes APGAR score after adjustment.

Conclusion: Leukocytosis, early onset preeclampsia, preterm birth, and thrombocytopenia, severity of preeclampsia, and HELLP syndrome are independent risks of having infant born with low APGAR score at 1 minute in preeclamptic deliveries.


Keywords


APGAR score; newborn; preeclampsia

Full Text:

PDF

References


  1. Gawde A, Bhosale UT. A Study of maternal and perinatal outcome in preeclampsia. Int J Stat. 2014;10(2):267-70.
  2. Saito S, Nakashima A. A review of the mechanism for poor placentation in early-onset preeclampsia: the role of autophagy in trophoblast invasion and vascular remodeling. J Reprod Immunol. 2014;101-102:80-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jri.2013.06.002
  3. Kishwara S, Tanira S, Omar E, Wazed F, Ara S. Effects of preeclampsia on perinatal outcome-a study done in the specialized urban hospital set up in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Med J. 2011;40(1):33-6.
  4. Zhang J, Landy HJ, Branch DW, Burkman R, Haberman S, Gregory KD, et al. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(6):1281-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181fdef6e
  5. Krilova Y. Chances of adverse neonatal outcome in high-risk and low-risk obstetrical patients. Clin Med Insig: Women's Health. 2008;1:3-14.
  6. Montgomery KS. APGAR scores: examining the long-term significance. J Perinat Educ. 2000;9(3):5-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1624/105812400X87716
  7. Jensen LV, Mathiasen R, Mølholm B, Greisen G. Low 5-min APGAR score in moderately preterm infants; association with subsequent death and cerebral palsy: a register based Danish national study. Acta Paediatr. 2012;101(2):e80-2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02516.x
  8. Ayaz A, Muhammad T, Hussain SA, Habib S. Neonatal outcome in pre-eclamptic patients. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2009;21(2):53-5.
  9. Chappell LC, Enye S, Seed P, Briley AL, Poston L, Shennan Ah. Adverse perinatal outcomes and risk factors for preeclampsia in women with chronic hypertension: a prospective study. Hypertension. 2008;51(4):1002-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.107565
  10. Verspyck E, Bisson V, Roman H, Marret S. Adverse respiratory outcome after premature rupture of membranes before viability. Acta Paediatr. 2014;103(3):256-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.12489
  11. Chang JJ, Muglia LJ, macones GA. Association of early‐onset preeclampsia in first pregnancy with normotensive second pregnancy outcomes: a population‐based study. BJOG. 2010;117(8):946-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02594.x
  12. van der Ven AJ, Schaaf JM, van Os MA, de Groot CJM, Haak MC, Pajkrt E, et al. Comparison of perinatal outcome of preterm births starting in primary care versus secondary care in Netherlands: a retrospective analysis of nationwide collected data. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2014;2014(2014):1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/423575
  13. Aabidha PM, Cherian AG, Paul E, Helan J. Maternal and fetal outcome in pre-eclampsia in a secondary care hospital in South India. J Family Med Prim Care. 2015;4(2):257-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.154669
  14. Kovo M, Shreiber L, Elyashiv O, Ben-Haroush A, Abraham G, Bar J. Pregnancy outcome and placental findings in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction with and without preeclampsia. Reprod Sci. 2015;22(3):316-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1933719114542024





Copyright (c) 2015 Sulaeman A. Susilo, Karina N. Pratiwi, Adly N.A. Fattah, Rima Irwinda, Noroyono Wibowo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

All articles and issues in Medical Journal of Indonesia have unique DOI number registered in Crossref.
 
Romeo