Use of 2D and multislice transperineal ultrasonography to describe the degree of perineal laceration following vaginal delivery

  • Budi I. Santoso Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta
  • Suskhan Djusad Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta
  • Surahman Hakim Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta
  • Fernandi Moegni Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta
  • Alfa P. Meutia Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta
  • Tyas Priyantini Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13181/mji.v27i2.1908
Keywords: 2D or multislice transperineal ultrasonography, perineal laceration, pill-rolling test, vaginal delivery
Abstract viewed: 1164 times
PDF downloaded: 847 times
HTML downloaded: 631 times
EPUB downloaded: 152 times

Abstract

Background: Perineal tear is the most common complication after vaginal delivery. Pill-rolling test is a widely used clinical evaluation method to determine the degree of perineal tear. However, the evaluation results of anal sphincter complex (ASC) differ between clinical examination and 2D/multislice transperineal ultrasonography (TPUS). This study aims to describe measurement variation between these modalities.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital from November 2015 to May 2016. Subjects were primiparous women after vaginal delivery. Clinical examination using pill-rolling test was performed to determine the degree of perineal laceration. Suture was conducted accordingly. The subjects were subjected to 2D/multislice TPUS 72 hours after delivery to evaluate the integrity of internal and external anal sphincters. Data were collected and analyzed to determine compatibility between these examinations.

Results: Among 70 prospective primiparous women, five were excluded due to unavailability to undergo 2D/multislice TPUS 72 hours after delivery. The mean duration to perform 2D/multislice TPUS was 4.5 minutes, and pain was tolerable during the examination. The compatibility values of clinical examination with 2D and multislice TPUS were 0.98 and 0.93, respectively, with Cohenâs kappa of 0.92 (95% CI 0.81-1.00) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.58-0.99), respectively.

Conclusion: Clinical examination is compatible with 2D/multislice TPUS for determining the degree of perineal tear after vaginal delivery.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Meriwether KV, Hall RJ, Leeman LM, Migliaccio L, Qualls C, Rogers RG. Anal sphincter complex: 2D and 3D endoanal and translabial ultrasound measurement variation in normal postpartum measurements. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(4):511-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2524-5

  2. Meriwether KV, Hall RJ, Leeman LM, Migliaccio L, Qualls C, Rogers RG. Postpartum translabial 2D and 3D ultrasound measurements of the anal sphincter complex in primiparous women delivering by vaginal birth versus cesarean delivery. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(3):329-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2215-7

  3. Rieger N, Schloithe A, Saccone G, Wattchow D. A prospective study of anal sphincter injury due to childbirth. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1998;33(9):950-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/003655298750026976

  4. McCandlish R, Bowler U, van Asten H, Berridge G, Winter C, Sames L, et al. A randomised controlled trial of care of the perineum during second stage of normal labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105(12):1262-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10004.x

  5. Christianson LM, Bovbjerg VE, McDavitt EC, Hullfish KL. Risk factors for perineal injury during delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(1):255-60. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2003.547

  6. Roos AM, Abdool Z, Sultan AH, Thakar R. The diagnostic accuracy of endovaginal and transperineal ultrasound for detecting anal sphincter defects: the PREDICT study. Clin Radiol. 2011; 66(7):597-604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2010.11.017

  7. Abdool Z, Sultan AH, Thakar R. Ultrasound imaging of the anal sphincter complex: a review. Br J Radiol. 2012; 85(1015):865-75. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/27314678

  8. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartram CI. Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(26):1905-11. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199312233292601

  9. Valsky DV, Messing B, Petkova R, Savchev S, Rosenak D, Hochner-Celnikier D, et al. Postpartum evaluation of the anal sphincter by transperineal three-dimensional ultrasound in primiparous women after vaginal delivery and following surgical repair of third-degree tears by the overlapping technique. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29(2):195â204. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.3923

  10. Fernando RJ, Sultan AH, Kettle C, Thakar R. Methods of repair for obstetric anal sphincter injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;8(12):CD002866. https://doi.org/10.100 /14651858.CD002866.pub3

  11. Dickinson KJ, Pickersgill P, Anwar S. Functional and physiological outcomes following repair of obstetrics anal sphincter injury. A case. Int J Surg. 2013;11(10):1137-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.08.017

  12. van Roon Y, Kirwin C, Rahman N, Vinayakarao L, Melson L, Kester N, et al. Comparison of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in nulliparous women before and after EPISCISSORS-60® at two hospitals in the United Kingdom. Int J Womens Health. 2015;7:949–55. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S94680

  13. Sultan AH, Ranee T, Fenner DE. Diagnosis of perineal trauma. In: Perineal and Anal Sphincter Trauma: Diagnosis and Clinical Management. London: Springer-Verlag; 2007. p. 13-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-503-5_2

  14. Thiruvoth FM, Mohapatra DP, Sivakumar DK, Chittoria RK, Nandhagopal V. Current concepts in the physiology of adult wound healing. Plast Aesthet Res. 2015;2(5):250-6. https://doi.org/10.4103/2347-9264.158851

  15. Shek KL, Guzman-Rojas R, Dietz HP. Residual defects of the external anal sphincter following primary repair: an observational study using transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44(6):704-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.13368

  16. Dietz HP. Pelvic floor ultrasound: a review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(4):321-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.018

  17. Weinstein MM, Pretorius DH, Jung SA, Nager CW, Mittal RK. Transperineal three-dimensional ultrasound imaging for detection of anatomic defects in the anal sphincter complex muscles. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7(2):205-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2008.08.019

  18. Wieczorek AP, Stankiewicz A, Santoro GA, Woźniak MM, Bogusiewicz M, Rechberger T. Pelvic floor disorders: role of new ultrasonographic techniques. World J Urol. 2011;29(5):615-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0708-x

Published
2018-09-09
How to Cite
1.
Santoso BI, Djusad S, Hakim S, Moegni F, Meutia AP, Priyantini T. Use of 2D and multislice transperineal ultrasonography to describe the degree of perineal laceration following vaginal delivery. Med J Indones [Internet]. 2018Sep.9 [cited 2024Jul.3];27(2):108–13. Available from: http://mji.ui.ac.id/journal/index.php/mji/article/view/1908
Issue
Vol. 27 No. 2 (2018): June
Section
Clinical Research

Copyright (c) 2018 Budi I. Santoso, Suskhan Djusad, Surahman Hakim, Fernandi Moegni, Alfa P. Meutia, Tyas Priyantini

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Medical Journal of Indonesia agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant Medical Journal of Indonesia right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License that allows others to remix, adapt, build upon the work non-commercially with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in Medical Journal of Indonesia.
  2. Authors are permitted to copy and redistribute the journal's published version of the work non-commercially (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Medical Journal of Indonesia.

Most read articles by the same author(s)