Nine-segment laminectomy is safe for the resection of a schwannoma extending from C-2 to T-3: a rare case report

  • Mohamad Saekhu Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Nuryati Chairani Siregar Department of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Kevin Gunawan Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6797-7583
  • Setyo Widi Nugroho Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: kyphosis, laminectomy, schwannoma
Abstract viewed: 126 times
PDF downloaded: 143 times
HTML downloaded: 12 times
EPUB downloaded: 42 times

Abstract

Cervical spine schwannoma, which is long and entirely intracanal, is rare to be found. Its rarity and atypical feature leads to difficulty in diagnosing and managing cases because of the scarcity of available literature. The surgical removal of this type of schwannomas via multisegment laminectomy is a great challenge because of various risks of postoperative complications. This report describes cervical spine schwannoma that was initially was not suspected as schwannoma and was subject to surgical removal via nine-segment laminectomy. In one year after surgery, motor function returned to normal strength, no new neurological deficits occurred, and no kyphotic deformity, which is a common complication of multisegment laminectomy.

References

  1. Jinnai T, Koyama T. Clinical characteristics of spinal nerve sheath tumors: analysis of 149 cases. Neurosurgery. 2005;56(3):510-5. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000153752.59565.BB

  2. Kim SH, Doh JW, Yoon SM, Yun IG. Huge schwannoma extended from craniocervical junction to upper thoracic spine. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2003;34(6):589-92.

  3. Mahore A, Muzumdar D, Chagla A, Goel A. Pure ventral midline long segment Schwannoma of the cervicodorsal spine: a case report. Turk Neurosurg. 2009;19(3):302-5.

  4. Das JM, Peethambaran A. Total excision of a giant ventral midline cervical spinal intradural schwannoma via posterior approach. Asian Spine J. 2016;10(1):153-7. https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2016.10.1.153

  5. Kaptain GJ, Simmons NE, Replogle RE, Pobereskin L. Incidence and outcome of kyphotic deformity following laminectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg. 2000;93(2 suppl):199-204. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2000.93.2.0199

  6. Mehta AI, Adogwa O, Karikari IO, Thompson P, Verla T, Null UT, et al. Anatomical location dictating major surgical complications for intradural extramedullary spinal tumors: a 10-year single-institutional experience. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19(6):701-7. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.9.SPINE12913

  7. Modi M, Nilkanthe R, Trivedi P, Shah A, Shah J, Chaudhari J. Importance of intraoperative consultation for the diagnosis of central nervous system lesions and evaluation of its diagnostic accuracy. J Cancer Res Ther. 2018;14(6):1176-9. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1482.191034

  8. Plesec TP, Prayson RA. Frozen section discrepancy in the evaluation of central nervous system tumors. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007;131(10):1532-40. https://doi.org/10.1043/1543-2165(2007)131[1532:FSDITE]2.0.CO;2

  9. Nanarng V, Jacob S, Mahapatra D, Mathew JE. Intraoperative diagnosis of central nervous system lessions: comparison of squash smear, touch imprint, and frozen section. J Cytol 2016;32(3):153-8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9371.168835

  10. Al-Ajmi R, Al-Kindi H, George M, Thomas K. Correlation of intraoperative frozen section report and histopathological diagnosis of central nervous system tumors - a six-year retrospective study. Oman Med J. 2016;31(6):414-20. https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2016.84

  11. Çakir E, Oran G, Yüksek GE, Ding C, Tihan T. Intraoperative consultations of central nervous system tumors: a review for practicing pathologists and testing of an algorithmic approach. Turk Patoloji Derg. 2019;35(3):173-84. https://doi.org/10.5146/tjpath.2018.01460

  12. Gogoi G, Teronpi J, Changsan LL, Saikia P, Borgohain M. A study on schwannomas: morphology alone is insufficient. J Mol Biomark Diagn. 2016;7(5):300. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9929.1000300

  13. Jaiswal S. Role of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of central nervous system tumors. Neurol India 2016;64:502-12. https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886.181547

  14. Boulagnon-Rombi C, Fleury C, Fichel C, Lefour S, Bressenot AM, Gauchotte G. Immunohistochemical approach to the differential diagnosis of meningiomas and their mimics. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2017;76(4):289-98. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnen/nlx008

  15. Jialal I, Sokoll LJ. Clinical utility of lactate dehydrogenase: a historical perspective. Am J Clin Pathol. 2015;143(2):158-9. https://doi.org/10.1309/AJCTP0FC8QFYDFA

  16. Bochen K, Krasowska A, Milaniuk S, Kulczyńska M, Prystupa A, Dzida G. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate - an old marker with new applications. J Pre Clin Clin Res. 2011;5(2):50-5.

  17. Yeh HM, Leung JH, Huang KC, Tung CL, Huang CL, Huang KM. A long segmental hemorrhagic spinal schwannoma with atypical presentation. J Radiol Sci. 2011;36:191-4.

  18. Ji C, Ahn JG, Huh HY, Park CK. Cervical schwannoma presenting with acute intracranial subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2010;47(2):137-9. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2010.47.2.137

  19. Sahoo RK, Das PB, Sarangi GS, Mohanty S. Acute hemorrhage within intradural extramedullary schwannoma in cervical spine presenting with quadriparesis. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2015;6(2):83-5. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.156069

  20. Ando K, Imagama S, Ito Z, Kobayashi K, Yagi H, Hida T, et al. How do spinal schwannomas progress? The natural progression of spinal schwannomas on MRI. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;24(1):155-9. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.3.SPINE141218

  21. Lenzi J, Anichini G, Landi A, Piciocchi A, Passacantilli E, Pedace F, et al. Spinal nerve schwannomas: experience on 367 cases-historic overview on how clinical, radiological, and surgical practices have changed over a course of 60 years. Neurol Res Int. 2017;2017:3568359. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3568359

  22. Zong S, Zeng G, Du L, Fang Y, Gao T, Zhao J. Treatment results in the different surgery of intradural extramedullary tumor of 122 cases. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e111495. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111495

  23. Parihar VS, Yadav N, Yadav YR, Ratre S, Bajaj J, Kher Y. Endoscopic management of spinal intradural extramedullary tumors. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2017;78(3):219-26. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1594014

  24. Sciubba DM, Chaichana KL, Woodworth GF, McGirt MJ, Gokaslan ZL, Jallo GI. Factors associated with cervical instability requiring fusion after cervical laminectomy for intradural tumor resection. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;8(5):413-9. https://doi.org/10.3171/SPI/2008/8/5/413

  25. Lu FZ, Zhang F, Xia XL, Ma XS, Wang LX, Jiang JY. Reconstruction to decrease postoperative deformity after cervical benign extramedullary tumor resection. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2016;9(4):7234-46.

  26. Onyia CU, Menon SK. Laminectomy versus laminoplasty in the surgical management of long-segment intradural spinal tumors: any difference in neurological outcomes? Asian J Neurosurg. 2018;13(4):1128-33. https://doi.org/10.4103/ajns.AJNS_67_18

  27. McGirt MJ, Garcés-Ambrossi GL, Parker SL, Sciubba DM, Bydon A, Wolinksy JP, et al. Short-term progressive spinal deformity following laminoplasty versus laminectomy for resection of intradural spinal tumors: analysis of 238 patients. Neurosurgery. 2010;66(5):1005-12. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000367721.73220.C9

  28. VanPelt C, Ulibarri JA, Kang JD. Cervical kyphosis following laminectomy: etiology, prevention, and surgical reconstruction. Semin Spine Surg. 2006;18(4):202-6. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semss.2006.09.006

  29. Vavklen P, Ganal-Antonio AK, Quidde J, Shen FH, Chapman JR, Samartzis D. Fundamentals of clinical outcomes assessment for spinal disorders: clinical outcome instruments and applications. Global Spine J. 2015;5(4):329-38. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1396046

  30. Zileli M, Maheswari S, Kale SS, Garg K, Menon SK, Parthiban J. Outcome measures and variables affecting prognosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: WFNS spine committee recommendations. Neurospine. 2019;16(3):435-47. https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.1938196.098

  31. Lam T, Noonan VK, Eng JJ, the SCIRE Research Team. A systematic review of functional ambulation outcome measures in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2008;46(4):246-54. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3102134

  32. Poncumhak P, Saengsuwan J, Kamruecha W, Amatachaya S. Reliability and validity of three functional tests in ambulatory patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2013;51(3):214-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2012.126

Published
2020-10-05
How to Cite
1.
Saekhu M, Siregar NC, Gunawan K, Nugroho SW. Nine-segment laminectomy is safe for the resection of a schwannoma extending from C-2 to T-3: a rare case report. Med J Indones [Internet]. 2020Oct.5 [cited 2020Dec.3];29(3):326-31. Available from: http://mji.ui.ac.id/journal/index.php/mji/article/view/2844
Section
Case Report/Series