The importance of registry for systematic review and clinical trial

  • Vivian Soetikno Medical Journal of Indonesia; Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: Editorial




The PLoS Medicine Editors. Best practice in systematic reviews: the importance of protocols and registration. PLoS Med. 2011;8(2):e1001009.

Ross JS, Mulvey GK, Hines EM, Nissen SE, Krumholz HM. Trial publication after registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: a cross-sectional analysis. PLoS Med. 2009;6(9):e1000144.

Straus S, Moher D. Registering systematic reviews. CMAJ. 2010;182(1):13-4.

Booth A, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Moher D, Petticrew M, Stewart L. An international registry of systematic-review protocols. Lancet. 2011;377(9760):108-9.

Silagy CA, Middleton P, Hopewell S. Publishing protocols of systematic reviews: comparing what was done to what was planned. JAMA. 2002;287(21):2831-4.

Loder E, Loder S, Cook S. Characteristics and publication fate of unregistered and retrospectively registered clinical trials submitted to The BMJ over 4 years. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e020037.

Irawati Y, Gondhowiardjo TD, Soebono H. Efficacy and safety of platinum chain and gold weight implants for paralytic lagophthalmos: a systematic review. Med J Indones. 2021;30(2):106-15.

Irdam GA, Febriyani, Rasyid N, Taher A. A systematic review of intracavernosal injection of mesenchymal stem cells for diabetic erectile dysfunction. Med J Indones. 2021;30(2):96-105.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.

How to Cite
Soetikno V. The importance of registry for systematic review and clinical trial. Med J Indones [Internet]. 2021Jun.30 [cited 2024Feb.26];30(2):87-8. Available from: